1 year ago
74
A promotion for Google's AI hunt instrumentality Bard shows it making a factual mistake astir the James Webb Space Telescope, heightening fears that these tools aren't acceptable to beryllium integrated into hunt engines
Technology 8 February 2023Google Bard is an AI chatbot designed to beryllium integrated into Google net searches Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto/Shutterstock
An advert for Google Bard, the tech giant’s experimental conversational AI, inadvertently shows the instrumentality providing a factually inaccurate effect to a query.
It is grounds that the determination to usage artificial quality chatbots similar this to supply results for web searches is happening excessively fast, says Carissa Véliz astatine the University of Oxford. “The possibilities for creating misinformation connected a wide standard are huge,” she says.
Google announced this week that it was launching an AI called Bard that volition beryllium integrated into its hunt motor aft a investigating phase, providing users with a bespoke written effect to their query alternatively than a database of applicable websites. Chinese hunt motor Baidu has besides announced plans for a akin project, and connected 7 February, Microsoft launched its ain AI results work for its Bing hunt engine.
Experts person warned New Scientist that determination is simply a hazard specified AI chatbots could springiness inaccurate responses arsenic if they were fact, due to the fact that they trade their output based connected the statistical availability of accusation alternatively than accuracy.
Now an advert connected Twitter from Google has shown Bard responding to the query “what caller discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope tin I archer my 9 twelvemonth aged about?” with incorrect results (see image, below).
A screengrab of an advert connected Twitter for Google Bard connected 8 Feb 2023 revealing an mistake the AI has made successful its response
The 3rd proposition fixed by Bard was “JWST took the precise archetypal pictures of a satellite extracurricular of our ain star system”. But Grant Tremblay astatine the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics pointed retired that this wasn’t true.
“I’m definite Bard volition beryllium impressive, but for the record: JWST did not instrumentality “the precise archetypal representation of a satellite extracurricular our star system”. the archetypal representation was alternatively done by Chauvin et al. (2004) with the VLT/NACO utilizing adaptive optics,” he wrote connected Twitter.
Bruce Macintosh, the manager of the University of California Observatories and portion of the squad that took the archetypal images of exoplanets, besides noticed the error, writing connected Twitter: “Speaking arsenic idiosyncratic who imaged an exoplanet 14 years earlier JWST was launched, it feels similar you should find a amended example?”
Véliz says the error, and the mode it slipped done the system, is simply a prescient illustration of the information of relying connected AI models erstwhile accuracy is important.
“It perfectly shows the astir important weakness of statistical systems. These systems are designed to springiness plausible answers, depending connected statistical investigation – they’re not designed to springiness retired truthful answers,” she says.
“We’re decidedly not acceptable for what’s coming. Companies person a fiscal involvement successful being the archetypal ones to make oregon to instrumentality definite kinds of systems, and they’re conscionable rushing done it,” says Véliz. “So we’re not giving nine clip to speech astir it and to deliberation astir it and they’re not adjacent reasoning astir it precise cautiously themselves, arsenic is evident by the illustration of this ad.”
Google didn’t respond to a petition for comment.
More connected these topics:
English (US) ·