Lori Garver on why NASA is returning to the moon for the wrong reasons

2 years ago 180

Ex-NASA lawman head Lori Garver helped make the now-booming backstage abstraction industry. But she says NASA is inactive excessively focused connected utilizing its satellite programme to supply jobs for US workers

Space 14 September 2022

By Jonathan O’Callaghan

A photograph   of ex-NASA lawman  head  Lori Garver

Lori Garver played an important relation successful kickstarting the abstraction industry

Everett Collection Inc/Alamy

Today, backstage firms play a important relation successful humanity’s abstraction activities. To springiness conscionable 1 example, Elon Musk’s institution SpaceX presently provides the lone rocket susceptible of taking astronauts from US ungraded to the International Space Station. This would ne'er person been imaginable without Lori Garver. As lawman head of NASA betwixt 2009 and 2013, her clip astatine the bureau was revolutionary. After a agelong past of NASA controlling each its activities itself, Garver acceptable it connected a caller path. She wanted to make a full caller abstraction industry, gathering up companies truthful that they could bash immoderate of the agency’s enactment much efficiently and cheaply.

Up until now, these companies person chiefly been operating successful Earth orbit. But the US is readying to return radical to the moon successful 2025 done its Artemis programme, and backstage companies are going to beryllium a important portion of that effort. Both SpaceX and Blue Origin, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, person been tasked with gathering landers that tin ferry humans to the moon’s surface, portion galore contractors will plan different systems too, specified arsenic caller spacesuits for astronauts. New Scientist caught up with Garver to spot what she makes of this caller epoch of lunar exploration.

Jonathan O’Callaghan: You played an important portion successful creating a backstage abstraction industry. What initially motivated you?
Lori Garver: At the time, NASA had a precise afloat sheet and the abstraction shuttle programme was expensive. Freeing up fund from quality …

Read Entire Article