The DOJ's antitrust case against Google is ambitious but risky

The Department of Justice's latest challenge to Google's tech empire is an ambitious plaything astatine the institution with the imaginable to rearrange the integer advertizing market. But alongside the anticipation of large reward comes important hazard successful seeking to propulsion the boundaries of antitrust law.

"DOJ is going large oregon going location here," said Daniel Francis, who teaches antitrust astatine NYU School of Law and antecedently worked arsenic lawman manager of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, wherever helium worked connected the agency's monopoly lawsuit against Facebook.

The DOJ's antitrust main Jonathan Kanter has indicated he's comfy with taking risks, often saying successful nationalist remarks that it's important to bring cases that question to situation existent conventions successful antitrust law. He said helium prefers much imperishable remedies similar breakups compared to promises to alteration behavior. That sentiment comes done successful the DOJ's petition successful its latest suit for the tribunal to unit Google to rotation disconnected parts of its advertisement business.

Antitrust experts accidental the Justice Department paints a compelling communicative astir the ways Google allegedly utilized acquisitions and exclusionary strategies to fend disconnected rivals and support monopoly powerfulness successful the integer advertizing space. It's 1 that, if the authorities gets its way, would interruption isolated a concern that's generated much than $50 cardinal successful gross for Google successful the past quarter, perchance opening up an full marketplace successful which Google is presently 1 of the astir important players.

But, they warn, the authorities volition look important challenges successful proving its lawsuit successful a tribunal strategy that progressive antitrust enforcers and galore lawmakers judge has taken connected a myopic presumption of the scope of antitrust law, particularly erstwhile it comes to integer markets.

"If they beryllium the violations they allege, they're going to get a remedy that's going to shingle up the market," said Doug Melamed, a scholar-in-residence astatine Stanford Law School who served astatine the Antitrust Division, including arsenic acting adjunct lawyer general, from 1996-2001 during the landmark lawsuit against Microsoft. "But it's not evident they're going to triumph this case."

Experts interviewed for this nonfiction said the DOJ volition look the situation of charting comparatively underexplored areas of antitrust instrumentality successful proving to the tribunal that Google's behaviour violated the instrumentality and harmed contention without benefitting consumers. Though that's a gangly order, it could travel with a immense upside if the bureau succeeds, perchance expanding the scope of antitrust instrumentality for integer monopoly cases to come.

"All antitrust cases are an uphill conflict for plaintiffs, acknowledgment to 40 years of lawsuit law," said Rebecca Haw Allensworth, an antitrust prof astatine Vanderbilt Law School. "This one's nary exception."

But, Allensworth added, the government's challenges whitethorn beryllium antithetic than those successful galore different antitrust cases.

"Usually the difficulty, particularly successful cases involving platforms, is marketplace definition," she said. In this case, the authorities argued the applicable marketplace is steadfast advertisement servers, advertisement exchanges, and advertiser advertisement networks — the 3 sides of the advertizing stack Google has its manus in, which the DOJ said it's leveraged to container retired rivals. "And here, I deliberation that that is comparatively straightforward for the DOJ."

"One mode to look astatine the latest ailment is that it is the newest and astir implicit draught of a critique that antitrust agencies successful the U.S. and overseas person been gathering against Google for implicit a decade," William Kovacic, who served connected the Federal Trade Commission from 2006 to 2011 and is present a prof astatine George Washington Law, said successful an email.

Google, for its part, has said the latest DOJ suit "tries to rewrite past astatine the disbursal of publishers, advertisers and net users." It claims the authorities is trying to "pick winners and losers" and that its products person expanded options for publishers and advertisers.

Compared to the DOJ's earlier lawsuit, which argued Google maintained its monopoly implicit hunt services done exclusionary contracts with telephone manufacturers, this 1 advances much nontraditional theories of harm, according to Francis, the NYU Law prof and erstwhile FTC official. That besides makes it much apt that Google volition determination to disregard the lawsuit to astatine slightest constrictive the claims it whitethorn person to combat aboriginal connected — a determination it did not instrumentality successful the earlier suit, helium added.

"This lawsuit breaks overmuch much caller crushed and it articulates theories, oregon it seems to articulate theories, that are close retired connected the borderline of what existing antitrust prohibits," Francis said. "And we're going to find out, erstwhile each is said and done, wherever the boundaries of integer monopolization truly lie."

DOJ took a gamble with this case. But if it wins, the rewards could lucifer the risk.

"In presumption of the imaginable interaction of the remedy, this could beryllium a bigger lawsuit than Microsoft," said Melamed.

Still, Francis cautioned, a tribunal could bid a little disruptive remedy, similar paying damages if it finds the authorities was harmed arsenic an advertizing purchaser, oregon simply requiring Google to halt the allegedly amerciable conduct, adjacent if it rules successful the DOJ's favor.

Like each antitrust cases, this 1 is improbable to beryllium concluded anytime soon. Still, a cardinal determination by the Justice Department could marque it speedier than different expected. The bureau filed the lawsuit successful the Eastern District of Virginia, which has gained a estimation arsenic the "rocket docket" for its comparatively businesslike gait successful moving cases along.

"What that signals to maine is that, fixed the timeframe for antitrust litigation is notoriously slow, DOJ is doing everything that they tin successful their prime of venue to guarantee that this litigation moves guardant earlier technological and commercialized changes marque it obsolete," Francis said.

He added that the justice who has been assigned the trial, Clinton appointee Leonie Brinkema, is regarded arsenic astute and just and has handled antitrust cases before, including 1 Francis litigated years ago.

"I could ideate that some sides volition consciousness beauteous bully astir having drawn Judge Brinkema arsenic a fair, businesslike and blase justice who volition determination the lawsuit on successful an expeditious way," Francis said.

Still, determination are hardly immoderate judges who person acquisition with a lawsuit similar this one, simply due to the fact that determination haven't been that galore integer monopolization cases decided successful court.

 "So immoderate justice who would beryllium proceeding this lawsuit is going to beryllium confronting frontier issues of antitrust mentation and principle," Francis said.

Outside of the courts, the lawsuit could person a much contiguous interaction successful different ways.

"From the constituent of presumption of strategy, the lawsuit adds a large complication to Google's defence by expanding the multiplicity and seriousness of nationalist bureau antitrust enforcement challenges," said Kovacic, the erstwhile FTC commissioner. "The swarming of enforcement astatine location and overseas is forcing the institution to support itself successful aggregate fora successful the US and successful jurisdictions specified arsenic the EU and India."

Regardless of outcomes, Kovacic said the sheer measurement of lawsuits and regularisation tin make a distraction for apical absorption and volition apt pb Google to much cautiously see its actions.

"That tin beryllium a superior resistance connected institution performance," Kovacic wrote.

The suit could besides lend credence to lawmakers' efforts to legislate astir integer advertisement markets. One proposal, the Competition and Transparency successful Digital Advertising Act, would prohibit ample companies similar Google from owning much than 1 portion of the integer advertizing system, truthful it couldn't ain tools connected some the bargain and merchantability broadside arsenic it presently does.

Importantly, the measure is sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, the ranking subordinate of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee connected antitrust. Lee has remained skeptical of immoderate other integer marketplace antitrust reforms, but his enactment connected this measure suggests determination whitethorn beryllium a broader radical of Republicans consenting to enactment this benignant of measure.

"An antitrust suit is good, but volition instrumentality a agelong clip and use to lone 1 company," Lee tweeted pursuing the DOJ's announcement, saying helium would soon reintroduce the measure. "We request to marque definite contention works for everyone, and soon."

Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., who has backed the House mentation of the bill, called the integer advertisement authorities "The astir important measure we tin determination forward" successful a caller interrogation with The Washington Post.

"This is intelligibly the blockbuster lawsuit truthful acold from the DOJ antitrust division," Francis said. "And I deliberation it represents a flagship effort to found caller instrumentality connected the borders of monopolization doctrine. And astatine the extremity of it — win, suffer oregon gully — it's truly going to lend to our knowing of what the Sherman Act really prohibits successful tech markets."

Subscribe to CNBC connected YouTube.

WATCH: Here's wherefore immoderate experts are calling for a breakup of Big Tech aft the House antitrust report