Angelina Jolie Could Take Brad Pitt Custody Battle All The Way To Supreme Court – Lawyer Explains

4 days ago
ARTICLE AD

HL spoke with a household lawyer who explained wherefore the histrion could proceed appealing to region the backstage justice assigned to her ongoing custody case.

Angelina Jolie‘s appeals successful her ongoing custody conflict with Brad Pitt, 57, could spell each the mode to the Supreme Court, according to an expert. Since Aug. 2020, Angelina, 46, has been pushing to remove the backstage judge assigned to the custody lawsuit surrounding the exes’ 5 insignificant children; Pax, 17, Zahara, 16, Shiloh, 15, and twins Knox and Vivienne, 13. Their eldest son, Maddox, 19, is legally an big and nary longer taxable to the custody battle.

Sources confirmed to HollywoodLife successful May that Judge John Ouderkirk, the justice who joined Jolie and Pitt successful 2014, tentatively granted the Moneyball histrion associated custody. Since the ruling was made, Jolie turned to California’s Second District Court of Appeal to person Ouderkirk removed contempt having initially picked him to regularisation implicit their case. And adjacent if she loses, she could “appeal the appeal,” household instrumentality lawyer Sabrina Shaheen Cronin, JD, MBA EXCLUSIVELY told HollywoodLife.

Angelina Jolie Brad Pitt Custody BattleAngelina Jolie’s appeals successful her ongoing custody conflict with Brad Pitt could spell each the mode to the Supreme Court. (Shutterstock)

“She tin instrumentality this to the Supreme Court. She tin entreaty the appellate decision,” Cronin said. During the latest proceeding connected July 9, Angelina’s lawyers argued that Judge Ouderkirk was not impartial successful the lawsuit and alleged that helium was moving connected ineligible matters which progressive Pitt’s lawyer. Brad’s lawyers lashed retired astatine Angelina and alleged that she was utilizing this contented arsenic a “delaying tactic” successful the custody case. “That’s what radical bash arsenic a maneuver to delay, delay, delay,” Cronin said. “If she does entreaty it, past Pitt’s campy could record for a impermanent bid to springiness him immoderate benignant of parenting time. It could beryllium a stall tactic.”

Cronin suggested that Angelina has “buyer’s remorse” and noted that she had already agreed to person Judge Ouderkirk rule implicit their case arsenic portion of an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). “That’s wherefore they’re saying that it’s a last-ditch attempt. They’re calling it a Hail Mary,” said Cronin. “That’s the problem. When you hold to bash thing successful the tribunal of law, successful this case, it’s an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). They wanted the determination to beryllium binding.”

Angelina Jolie Brad Pitt Custody BattleThe histrion has been pushing to region the backstage justice assigned to the custody lawsuit surrounding the exes’ 5 insignificant children; (L-R) Pax, Shiloh, Vivienne, Zahara, and Knox. (Shutterstock)

The A-listers person been embroiled successful a bitter custody conflict since the Maleficent star filed for divorcement astir 5 years agone successful September 2016. The erstwhile mates inactive hasn’t travel to a finalized statement connected sharing custody of their kids and Angelina yet wants to reverse a determination made earlier this twelvemonth which allows Brad to person associated custody.

“I deliberation due to the fact that [the judge] is ruling against her that present she is trying to entreaty that decision. It’s benignant of similar erstwhile idiosyncratic has a judgment, and they person buyer’s remorse and effort to person it overturned. It’s precise hard to overturn a tribunal order. There are lone a definite fig of things to overturn an bid and that is what she is trying to do,” said Cronin who noted that it’s chartless however often Brad sees his kids and however often helium has parenting time.

No determination has been made and a judgement from the appellate tribunal is inactive pending. Even if Angelina is palmy successful removing the judge, it’s not wide however it volition impact which rulings would basal speech from the finalization of their divorce, according to Cronin who said, “The divorcement is finalized. Their divorcement was final. The divorcement was legitimate.”